Research and Publication Ethics Policy (IJEER)
IJEER is committed to ethical, transparent, and responsible scholarly publishing. All stakeholders—authors, reviewers, editors, and the publisher—are expected to follow high standards of integrity. The journal aligns its ethical approach with internationally recognized best practices (e.g., COPE principles).
1) Core Ethical Principles
honesty in reporting and interpretation
respect for participants and communities
transparency in methods, data, and authorship
accountability for published content
fairness and confidentiality in peer review
2) Author Responsibilities
Authors must:
submit original work not under review elsewhere,
present data accurately and avoid fabrication or falsification,
cite sources correctly and avoid plagiarism,
ensure authorship reflects genuine intellectual contribution,
disclose funding and conflicts of interest,
document ethics approval/consent when required,
cooperate with editorial requests (e.g., clarifications, corrections).
3) Research Involving Humans/Animals
Where relevant, authors must provide:
name of approving ethics body (or justification if not required),
consent/assent procedures,
privacy protections and anonymization,
compliance with applicable national/international standards.
4) Misconduct and Unacceptable Practices
Examples include:
plagiarism and improper citation
fabrication/falsification/distortion of findings
duplicate publication
salami slicing
inappropriate/gift authorship or omission of contributors
undisclosed conflicts of interest
unethical research practice (missing approvals, harm, coercion)
5) Similarity Checking
IJEER may use similarity screening at submission and/or before acceptance. Manuscripts with problematic overlap may be returned for correction, rejected, or escalated for investigation.
6) Corrections, Retractions, and Expressions of Concern
If errors or ethical issues are confirmed, IJEER may:
publish a correction/erratum,
retract the article,
issue an expression of concern when investigation is ongoing.
7) Complaints and Appeals
Authors may appeal editorial decisions by providing clear justification and evidence. Ethical complaints are handled confidentially and fairly, with due process for all parties.
8) Generative AI (Ethics Perspective)
AI tools cannot be authors.
AI use must be disclosed (tool + purpose).
AI must not generate fabricated citations, data, or results.
Authors remain fully responsible for accuracy and integrity.
